Although, not one of my normal topics, but I wanted to share a recent favorable result before the Mississippi Employee Appeals Board. The case involved alleged misconduct by my client, a corrections officer, based on allegations made by an inmate. Following termination at the hearing officer level, my client retained me for an appeal before the Mississippi Employee Appeals Board. Thankfully my client was reinstated.
A repost from the Ultimate Disability Guide. Some great practical advice.
Did you collect and send in all your medical evidence? You should not rely on Social Security to get all your medical information. You should do whatever you have to do to make sure all of your relevant medical evidence is in your file for Social Security to review when deciding your claim. You can call Social Security to see what medical information they were able to get. You can also check with your doctor to see if your records were sent to Social Security.
Do you have opinion evidence from your treating doctors? This can be in the form of a report detailing your medical condition and how it limits you. You can also have your treating doctor fill out an RFC form. Without opinion evidence from your treating doctors in the file you will have to rely on what Social Security’s doctors say your limitations are from your medical conditions. Your treating doctors are supposed to be given more weight than the opinions of the Social Security doctors so it is highly recommended that you get this opinion evidence from your doctors.
Do you understand what you have to prove to win your case? If you do not know what you have to prove to win your particular case you should research Social Security disability law as much as you can. You may also want to consider hiring a lawyer to help you with your claim.
Did you respond to all the letters you got from Social Security? If you received a letter from Social Security requesting specific information you should make sure you provide Social Security the information they are looking for. Read every letter you get from Social Security. You would be surprised at how many cases are held up or denied because claimants did not respond to a letter sent by Social Security looking for certain information.
Did you appeal your denial? You should make sure to appeal any denial you get within the time frame you are allowed. Most appeals must be filed within 60 days.
The above checklist is very basic and too many of you might seem like common sense but sometimes a simple reminder like this can help you realize you need to stay involved in your claim. I hope this information is helpful and wish you luck.
In the past I have blogged about the narrow scope of Mississippi’s Expungement statute, as well as the collateral consequences of a conviction. The Mississippi Legislature has finally decided to heed the public’s call for a more expansive expungement statute.
The new statute allows a first time offender to have one felony expunged five years after completion of the terms and conditions of the sentence and conviction. Most notably, for larceny and possession of a controlled substance.
The following is a link to the text of the full bill:
I field numerous questions from potential claimants concerning how the Social Security Administration (SSA) determines a person’s disability. The following is a very brief outline illustrating the five steps untilized by SSA.
To determine if a person is disabled, the SSA uses a five-step “sequential evaluation:”Step 1. Is the applicant working?
Step 2. Is the condition “severe?” - that is, does it limit ability to do some basic work activity, physical or mental or both?
Step 3. Does the applicant “meet” or “equal” one of the impairments listed in the SSA disability law?
Step 4. Is the applicant able to return to past relevant work (work performed within the last 15 years)?
Step 5. Can the applicant perform any other work in the national economy, considering his/her age, education and past work?
While the determination process is riddled with untold exceptions the above described test, is a great starting point in evaluating your potential claim.
Slightly off topic, but wanted to share a recent victory before the Mississippi Employee Appeals Board. The case involved alleged misconduct on behalf of my client and some of his fellow correctional officers. Following termination at the hearing officer level, my client retained me for an appeal before the Mississippi Employee Appeals Board. Thankfully my client was reinstated with back pay.
I routinely field calls from people, mostly elderly inquiring about a life estate deed for their home and property. To help shed some light on the subject I wanted to post an excerpt from fellow blogger attorney Brian Treacy concerning life estates:
From Treacy’s Blog
Very often clients want to “protect” their home for the family. Some think the best way to do this is giving it giving to other family members. More typically the question that is asked in this manner: “How do I add my children’s name to my deed?”. While protecting the home is a legitimate concern, there are smart ways and bad ways of achieving that goal. There is tremendous risk when transferring outright ownership to other family members, including harmful tax implications. It is just as harmful to simply add a child’s name to your deed.
A preferable method of transfer is called a Life Estate Deed.
A Life Estate Deed used for basic Estate Planning is a way to transfer ownership of property at death in the same way one might want to in a Will. The benefit of this transfer is that the Life Estate deed AVOIDS PROBATE. Thus, it is a simple, and inexpensive, way to transfer ownership of the home at death.
Use of a Life Estate Deed in Medicaid planning is a method to protect the home and have it considered an “exempt asset” for Medicaid purposes, meaning you can own a life estate and still ask Medicaid to help finance your nursing home care.
Let’s look at the list of potential benefits of a parent(s) using the Life Estate deed as a planning tool to convey a home to children:
Another Medicaid planning and probate-avoidance strategy involves a parent purchasing a life estate in the home of a child. Medicaid allows this so long as the parent actually resides in the home for at least a year after the purchase.
To determine exactly how a gift of a remainder interest will affect eligibility for Medicaid, the look-back period and the value of the transfer must be considered. The transfer is not considered to be for the full value of the house but only the “remainder interest” in the house. The remainder interest is the right that the children have to receive the home automatically upon the death of the parent. The value of the remainder interest is calculated using special actuarial tables that determine the parent’s life expectancy. The number of months of ineligibility is calculated by dividing the value of the transfer by a number known as the “penalty divisor” Medicaid cannot require an applicant to liquidate the life estate or to rent the life estate interest property. However, if the property is rented, the net rental income must go to the nursing home resident and will be counted in determining eligibility for Medicaid.
Along with questions regarding expungements, I routinely field calls concerning one’s ability to own or possess a firearm if previously convicted. In Mississippi the answer is quite simple, it is a crime punishable by up to ten years in prison for a convicted felon to possess a firearm. It is important to note it does not matter what type of felony, as the statute is clear it is ANY felony. However, Mississippi law does allow a convicted felon to petition the Court of conviction for a Certificate of Rehabilitation, which if granted would allow them to lawfully possess a firearm.
In pertinent part, Miss. Code Ann. Sec. 97-37-5(3) provides:
A person who has been convicted of a felony under the laws of this state may apply to the court in which he was convicted for a certificate of rehabilitation. The court may grant such certificate in its discretion upon a showing to the satisfaction of the court that the applicant has been rehabilitated and has led a useful, productive and law-abiding life since the completion of his sentence and upon the finding of the court that he will not be likely to act in a manner dangerous to public safety.
Feel free to post questions.
Without fail I get at least one call a week concerning having a misdemeanor conviction removed from someone’s record. Given how routine background checks have become, the negative consequences of having a prior conviction can seriously restrict employment opportunities. Thus, anyone with a conviction should seriously consider having their record expunged.
Mississippi Law allows the following in regards to expunging a misdemeanor:
Any person who has been convicted of a misdemeanor, excluding a conviction for a traffic violation, and who is a first offender, may petition the…court…for an order to expunge any such conviction from all public records… The effect of such order shall be to restore such person, in the contemplation of the law, to the status he occupied before such arrest. No person as to whom such order has been entered shall be held thereafter under any provision of law to be guilty of perjury or to have otherwise given a false statement by reason of his failure to recite or acknowledge such arrest or conviction in response to any inquiry made of him for any purpose…
(2) Upon petition therefor, a justice, county, circuit or municipal court shall expunge the record of any case in which an arrest was made, the person arrested was released and the case was dismissed or the charges were dropped or there was no disposition of such case.
Slightly off topic but wanted to share a recent Mississippi Court of Appeals decision, on a case where I served as appellate counsel for the Appellee. The case dealt with the Bounds of the Bounds family cemetery. It is an interesting read on construing ambigious deeds, grantor’s intent, burial rights, etc. Thankfully, the Court affirmed.
I write this post in an effort to dispel what I deem an unfortunate myth in the discharge upgrade process. The myth is so pervasive that even the Army Disharge Review Board’s website devotes a significant converage trying to debunk it. Quite simply, discharges DO NOT AUTOMATICALLY UPGRADE after six months.
In reality the process of upgrading a discharge requires more than merely demonstrating a “clean” civilian record for x number of years. A helpful resource for those interested can be found here:
As one can see the process can be quite involved and retaining an experienced attorney is certainly advantageous in framing one’s argument. Lastly, given the long term consquences of a negative discharge, upgrading if possible should be a priority for those effected.
Feel free to post questions.